This section gives background information about the creation of the HMMWV. the basis of the civilian HUMMER. As always, questions, comments, and corrections should be sent to the author by using the Feedback button. Contents:
CompetitionIn the late 70's, the US Army realized that it had too many vehicles doing different jobs that a single vehicle family should be able to do. Some were created for a particular job and were questionably successful at doing the job. The military wanted a single, more versatile family that could be tailored to specific duties while remaining virtually mechanically identical. In 1979, the military announced a competition for the design of a new vehicle and released preliminary specifications. At the beginning of 1981, the Army released the final specifications for the new vehicle called the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle, HMMWV. The specifications would allow the HMMWV to replace several vehicles in the current inventory while providing capabilities beyond any other vehicle. The specs gave requirements for both the shape and mechanics of the vehicle. Roof height, hood height, and profile were defined. Furthermore, the military wanted to standardize mobility for combat vehicles so that all could remain together. Therefore, the HMMWV had to meet the same specs as the Bradley's and M1 tanks. The 16" ground clearance, 60% grade, 40% side slope, 18" vertical step, 30" fording w/o preparation, etc. are the military's mobility requirements for combat vehicles, including the HMMWV. Starting in 1979, AM General, Chrysler Defense, and Teledyne were interested in the contract. AM General did not have anything in production that would meet the (still forthcoming) specifications and started a totally new design. The Chrysler vehicle was based on the Saluki. The Teledyne was based on the Cheetah. [Trivia - the Cheetah is the Lamborghini LM design (e.g. LM002). When Lamborghini and Teledyne lost the contract, Lambo turned the Cheetah into the LM series of luxury desert cruisers.] Prototype vehicles were delivered to the military for initial evaluation. Problems were noted and the designers had to submit design/part changes and test the new assemblies. If Army liked the changes, preproduction models were requested and entered into durability and performance testing (Phase I) at test facilities. Phase II testing was done by actual soldiers in the field. Phase III tested the vehicle in different terrains (desert, grasslands, etc) and for the marine environment (Marine Corps). After all vehicles had passed the tests, a contract would be issued. AM General was the first to complete the testing. Since the vehicle was also the lightest and best performing, AM General won the contract and the HMMWV as we know it was born. The HMMWV replaced the M151 1/4 ton Jeep, M274 1/2 ton Mechanical Mule, M561 1 1/4 ton Gamma Goat, M718A1 Ambulance, M792 Ambulance, and some M880 1 1/4 ton trucks. On March 22, 1983, the Army ordered 55,000 HMMWVs for $1.2 billion. They were to be delivered over a 5 year period with 15 different configurations. The Army increased the orders to 70,000 vehicles. In 1989, AM General received another 5 year contract for 33,000 more. The Original 15The advantage of the HMMWV is that it can be used in a variety of roles while still remaining mechanically identical. The military refers to all HMMWVs (pronounced Hum-Vee) generically as M998, M998A1, or M998A2. Different models actually have different designations but share the same frame, suspension, drivetrain, hood, and lower body. Originally there were 5 models: Cargo/Troop Carrier, TOW Carrier, Armament Carrier, Shelter Carrier, and Ambulance. From these, 15 configurations were produced. All configurations (except M1037/M1042 Shelter Carriers) have a payload of 2,500 lbs (1 1/4 or 5/4 ton) with varying GVWs.
M996 - Ambulance, 2 litter, armored
Major Revisions and Configuration ChangesThe original HMMWV uses the Detroit Diesel 6.2L V8, 150hp, 250 lbs-ft, TH 400 3sp automatic, NPG 218 full-time 4wd transfer case with a 2.61:1 low, AMC 20 housings with 2.56:1 differential gear ratios, Torsen differentials, 1.92:1 geared hubs, 4 wheel independent suspension, 2 piece wheels with bias ply Goodyear Wrangler RT/II tires, and 25 gallon fuel tanks. The hood is a fiberglass composite and the body is made of 6061T6 aluminum. All configurations (except M1037/M1042 Shelter Carriers) have a payload of 2,500 lbs (1 1/4 or 5/4 ton) with varying GVWs. The basic M998 has a curb weight of 5,200 lbs. When the 105mm M119 Light Howitzer entered service, the M1069 Prime Mover HMMWV was introduced. The M119 and M1069 Prime Mover and more easily air transportable than the older 105mm howitzer and can also use newer ammunition. Eventually the military wanted a higher payload capacity and in 1991, AM General began investigations. The result was the M1097 Heavy HMMWV Variant (HHV). It has a payload of 4,400 lbs and curb weight of 5,600 lbs for a GVW of 10,000 lbs. and a higher towing capacity. It entered production in late 1992. Rear springs, spring seats, frame crossmembers, and shocks were modified (but not the engine or drivetrain). The M1097 was basically designed as new type of Shelter Carrier, however, it can also be a Cargo/Troop Carrier. AM General also released a kit to upgrade all of the other models with the new components to increase standardization and durability. Seeing a new application for the HMMWV using the HHV chassis, AM General developed a superior armor protection system for the weapons carriers, the Up-Armored HMMWV. Ballistic materials are added to both the interior and exterior. The windows are 1.6 inch thick, non-spalling polycarbonate. The weapons station optionally gets armor also. The result is 360 degree occupant protection from 7.62 mm AP rounds. The roof can withstand 155mm airburst fragments. I also believe it protects against direct 7.62mm ball but not AP rounds (oblique only). Optional underbody panels protect against 4 lbs antipersonnel or 12 lbs antitank mines. The engine and rear cargo compartment do not get any additional protection beyond the basic armor kit. The military has very few of these up-armored units (<75 ordered in 1992), designated XM1109, b/c of the loss in cargo capacity. In early 94, the A1 series came out. The A1s had all the M1097 chassis upgrades, some interior changes, new rear halfshafts, and some electrical changes. Once again, the engine was untouched. I believe that the transfer case was replaced with the NPG 242 full-time transfer case with a 2.72:1 low range, the differentials were changed to a 2.73:1 ratio, and the new 2 piece wheels with the radial Goodyear 37x12.50/16.5 MT were used. Almost all models continued in the new A1 configuration (e.g. M998A1, M1025A1, M1097A1, etc). The GVWs were increased by 180 lbs (except the M1097A1 was still 10,000 lbs). The M1097A1 replaced the production of the M1037/M1042 as the Shelter Carrier. In 1995, the A2 series was introduced. The A2s are based on the A1s but use the Detroit Diesel 6.5L V8 diesel (170 hp, 290 lbs-ft) and the 4L80E electronically controlled 4 sp automatic. They are also Central Tire Inflation System (CTIS) ready, i.e. CTIS is field installable with a kit. Some further changes to the interior, heater, and cargo mounts. I also believe that they switched to the larger halfshafts. All A2 models have a GVW of 10,300 lbs with available payload depending on the curb weight. Note that the M1097A2 payload did not increase. My theory is that the M1097A1 caused a loss in mobility b/c of the higher weight. The 60% grade figure is actually a power rating. The 6.2L and 10,000 lbs payload, even with the new gearing, could not achieve the 60% grade rating. The switch to the 6.5L allows it to meet performance figures. With the A2 release, some of the model numbers were simplified. There is no longer a different number for vehicles with or without winches. It is now considered an option that can be installed or removed as the mission requires. For example, the M1025 and M1026 turned into the M1025A1 and M1026A1, and then into the M1025A2. The M1097A2 is actually classified as a Cargo/Troop/Shelter Carrier and replaces the M998A1 and M1038A1 Cargo/Troop Carrier in production. The M1097A1 had replaced the M1037/M1042 Shelter Carriers already. With the additional payload, the M1097A2 can be fitted with a TOW launcher, 30mm ASP-30 auto cannon, or a 50 caliber GAU-19/A 3 barrel Gattling gun. Like in the M998 case, the US military M1097A2s do not use the weapons mount. Note that the latest HMMWV models are still generically referred to as M998A2 even though there is no such number anymore. As another simplification, the Army no longer differentiates between the TOW and Armament Carriers b/c they can carry either. The M1025A1/M1026A1 Armament Carrier became the M1025A2. The M996A1/M1036A1 TOW Carrier became the M1025A2 TOW/Armament Carrier also. To further confuse matters, the US Marines decided to keep the models separate. They have a M1043A2 Armament Carrier and a M1045A2 TOW carrier, both with supplemental armor. The M1097A2 also becomes the basis for the new Expanded Capability Vehicle (ECV). The ECV ups the payload from 4,400 to 5,300 lbs, curb weight from 5,900 to 6,200 lbs for a 11,500 lbs GVW. The ECV uses modified differentials, brakes, halfshafts, wheels (1 piece), runflats, and frame. Many of these components come from the Cab-Over HMMWV Variant (COHV). The ECV also uses the Detroit Diesel 6.5L V8 turbo diesel (190 hp, 385 lbs-ft) to maintain the performance figures. The ECV comes from the factory with CTIS and AC installed. The body from the Up-Armored HMMWV, the XM1109, is placed onto this frame and is called the M1113 Up-Armored ECV. It comes in a square or slant back that is armored or unarmored. Furthermore, the hood can be armored also. It uses the additional underbody panels for occupant mine protection (4 lbs AP, 12 lbs AT). It offers full 360 degree occupant protection from 7.62mm AP rounds. The M1113 offers the protection of the XM1109 with no loss in payload. The US Army uses two versions of the M1113: the M1114 Armament Carrier and the M1115 TOW Carrier. Other VariantsThere are a few additional variants of the HMMWV that I know of and am sure there are quite a few more.
Civilian HUMMER HMMWV FAQ/Trivia
HMMWV Photo GalleryThe HMMWV Photo Gallery contains pictures of various configurations. Note that some images are large. Follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/OffRoadDotCom
| Enewsletters
Stay on Top of All the Action: |