Here's
the page where we lump all of your responses, rumors,
rants, raves and insight into the world of dirt bikes.
Click
here and email away.
|
Check
Through The Comments By Month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/05/03
Excellent
column! Thank you! our whole household enjoys your stories.
Eric M.
Romanoff and Family
02/10/03
Kim, I
wanted to say that your piece on the Utah Life Flight hit home
for me. I
am a Dirt Biker, and a ATVer. I am also a certified aircraft
mechanic and a
avid model helicopter builder/flyer. I have many friends that
are Medivac
crew members across the country and I always get a cold chill
when one goes
down, hoping that I don't get a call saying that one of my
friends is gone.
Your sister is a hero, every day. You should be most proud of
her (as I am
sure you are)! I really don't think that most people realize how
many lives
are saved by rescue helicopters and their crews, hopefully your
article will
open some of their eyes.
Nice Work.
Dave
Bottita
Las Vegas, Nv
02/12/03
We all get
a kick out of these great articles...... This lady is a
realllllly talented writer.
Her sense
of humor is outstanding and she seems to be a really cool
person.....keep up the good work
Joe Martin
02/03/02
I would
like to learn more about the K-turn and the kick-stand pivot
turns mentioned (but not described) in this article by Ron
Sobchik.
Thanks,
Lance Heaton
Lance
- Thanks for bring this up! I learned something today which will
save me a lot of pain! I will insert a sidebar into the article
-
Editor
The
kick stand pivot is pretty simple really. Assuming that you have
a sturdy side kick stand, and you are on a surface that is solid
(or can find a rock or other support to put under the kick stand
so it wont sink into the ground), you merely pivot the bike up
onto the side stand so that it is the only part touching the
ground and then walk the bike around the pivot. You will find
that this really beats trying to muscle the bike around on a
tight trail against the drag of the tire. The bike is somewhat
precariously balanced on the single point so you have to use
some judgment about where to do such a turn, and if someone is
there to steady the bike while you do the pivot, that is
certainly a safer way to go.
As
far as the K-turn (I don't know why it's called a K turn), that
addresses the difficulty that most riders have when they stall
the bike climbing a hill, and need to get turned around and
headed back down. The major difficulty is the rider is forced to
dismount in order to turn the motorcycle, and suddenly has no
control of the rear brake. The front too lightly loaded to offer
a lot of traction and the rider winds up using a lot of muscle
and struggling with his own footing to overcome this. In the K
turn, you basically leave the bike in gear ( usually this is a
lower gear) when it stalls, and use the engine compression
modulated by the clutch to control the rear tire of the
motorcycle. Suddenly you have a front and a rear brake, both
controlled from the handlebars, when you can reach them while
you are struggling on the side of the hill. This little trick
makes the tasking of turn the bike around and aiming it back
down the hill much more doable than if you are trying to control
it with only the front brake.
Ron
02/12/03
Mike, My
dealer just let me know that my 2003 WR 450 was ready for pick
up. Parting with my 2002 isn't easy, it has an FMF Qseries/Powerbomb
with YZ timing which gives it alot of bottom end. At least my
brother in law is buying it, so it'll be in the family.
I would be
interested in seeing the following dyno comparison:
RPM | 2002
WR Stock | 2003 WR 450 Stock | 2003 WR 450/Big Gun Exhaust
Best
Regards,
Bill
Loveys
We'll
see what we can do - but don't hold your breath for all of it.
-
Editor
02/12/03
Just out
of curiosity are you aware of the large number of woodruff key
failures new WR owners are experiencing. My bike is #1321 and
the key failed almost immediately. There are two other WR's here
in Memphis, TN which bit the dust today. Besides this problem
the bike seems to have great potential. The suspension is
awesome right out of the box(6'2" 215lbs) but the jetting
is extremely lean to start with even with the restrictor plug in
the exhaust. Removing the plug which most WR owners are doing
myself included results in an overly loud bike. A friends YZF
with stock exhaust is even quieter. I would like to see some
test of quieter performance exhaust.
For the record I have the following mods on my bike:
- GPR
upper triple clamp, bar mounts and dampner
- Pro
Taper woods bend
- Moose
bark busters mounted to Amp tripple clamp mount
- DSP
carbon fiber lower and upper fork guards
- E-line
carbon skid plate
- Zip-Ty
fuel screw, shark fin,chain guide and magnetic drain plug
- Guts
tall seat foam & gripper cover
- Devol
radiator guards
- Jetting-
#160 main, #48 pilot, #72 starter jet,fuel screw 1 &1/2
turns with stock needle in stock clip position
- Pirelli
tires mt44 front & mt16 rear
I look
forward to future reports on the bike.
Thanks
Tripp Volz
Memphis TN
Please
see the following article for more information on the Woodruff
Key failures: http://www.off-road.com/dirtbike/projects/wr450f/tech/tips/
A
test on a quieter exhaust system is coming.
-
Editor
02/18/03
any idea
what the timing change is going to cost (new yz 450 cam)????
do you think the exhaust changeout would be a good enuff power
mod or is there substantial hp increase by doing the pipe and
the timing. reason i ask is that this is starting to get a
little pricey for both mods.
if you had to do one mod what would you choose.
thanx for your time and advice. excellent website by the way!!!!
chris jepsen
edmonton,alberta, canada
We
will post what we know when we get more info.
-Editor
2/20/03
Good
review. But in California, and everywhere else where riding
areas are in danger, the single most important feature of a new
off road bike is whether or not it has been "green
stickered", or certified green sticker eligible. Who cares
if it's easy to start or light if you cannot ride it. Duh. I
suggest putting pressure on the manufacturers to certify their
bikes - KTM can do it on a small budget - and thus avoid handing
a ready made, unrebuttable argument to those groups opposed to
off road motorized recreation. After all, the environmental
concerns of these groups can be defeated with technology and
effort, but that technology must come from the manufacturers who
put in the effort to put their riders' best interests (and
thereby their own) first. My friend has a WR426 with a loud
exhaust, and it's just a ridiculous set up. Manufacturers and
even the AMA should wise up and wake up. Nobody needs loud,
pollution emitting machines on public property. Until these
concerns are met, we can all watch the sun set on our riding
areas as they are forced to close. While these manufacturers can
opt to build tennis rackets, golf clubs or stereo equipment, we
cannot as easily invent new areas on which to ride. While they
can sell their machines overseas or in other countries, we can
not let them abandon our loyal riders here in California and the
US. That's why the most serious and dangerous flaw in Yamaha's R
& D of the WR450 represents a dagger in the heart of off
road riding. When a major manufacturer creates a marquee product
that gives the bird to the reality of riding regulations, then
we can all blame ourselves for not demanding better.
While
I appreciate your enthusiasm for the sport and understand your
anger concerning these important issues, you have some
misapprehensions that need correcting. To the best of my
knowledge:
- The
bike, as every other Motorcycle and Automobile sold in the
United States, conforms to EPA regulations in both noise and
emissions. While these regulations started to include
emissions for off-road bikes in 2000, most manufacturers
already adhered to the same practices for street bikes with
their off-road four stroke motorcycles, excluding CV
carburetion. Honda even spent a tremendous amount of R &
D on making two strokes much cleaner burning.
- California
is the only state which currently requires a higher
standard. By 2006, manuafacturers will have to meet new
requirements only slightly less extreme than California's,
see: http://www.amadirectlink.com/legisltn/releases/2002/g02029.asp
- The
WR 426 '02 models were designed and manufactured prior to
July 2001 - before the tougher 2002 CARB restrictions were
in place.
- From
Yamaha; the bike has a "butt plug" - if you will
pardon the expression - that severely restricts noise (and
performance) - much lower than the required 96dBa. What the
owner does after delivery is not the responsibility of
Yamaha or any other manufacturer. See the "fine
print" on the exhaust itself: http://www.off-road.com/dirtbike/projects/wr450f/2003_02/ti-pipe.jpg.
- Yamaha
manufactures a replacement insert - the GYT-R (part number
GYT-5TJ93-75-00) which brings the noise below 96dBa while
providing full open exhaust performance. So while the bike
does not come with the out-of-the-box exhaust we expect from
KTM, it does provide a low cost option. Most other
manufacturers provide a junk system that needs to be
replaced entirely.
- The
AMA is indeed recommending less noise to manufacturers, and
has taken a stance against excessive noise for many years -
starting first with street bikes like cruisers and
"crotch rockets" which have user installed
aftermarket "open" or performance exhausts. See: http://www.amadirectlink.com/legisltn/positions/noise.asp
- From
The BlueRibbon Coalition referring to the new California (CARB)
restrictions: http://www.sharetrails.org/index.cfm?page=42&story=82
"This
new law was enacted with the support of the BlueRibbon
Coalition, the American Motorcyclist Association, all of the
California AMA Districts, the Motorcycle Industry Council,
the California Motorcycle Dealers Association, and the
California Off-Road Vehicle Association (CORVA)."
- The
BlueRibbon Coalition has been working with aftermarket
performance exhaust companies like Big Gun to make lower
noise systems.
At
this time the pressure is already on, and manufacturers are
responding, some very proactively. It makes no business sense
for a manufacturer to ignore these signs, as the American market
is extremely important to their business.
By the way - I love KTMs too, but I ride a Suzuki RM250 myself.
-
Editor
"KTM
can do it on a small budget - and thus avoid handing a ready
made, unrebuttable argument to those groups opposed to off
road motorized recreation."
Hold
on, this might be a can of worms. According to folks in the
industry I
talked with - KTM's might not meet the "real"
requirements. The government
doesn't check to see if green sticker bikes actually meet
requirements.
"Nobody
needs loud, pollution emitting machines on public
property."
Spodeboy
has let you know about this...
That's
why the most serious and dangerous flaw in Yamaha's R & D
of the WR450 represents a dagger in the heart of off road
riding. When a major manufacturer creates a marquee product
that gives the bird to the reality of riding regulations, then
we can all blame ourselves for not demanding better.
Dude,
my sources tell me the only reason the WR450 does not get a
green
sticker is due to the fact that some lawyers couldn't get the
paper work
done in time. FWIW- you emit more pollution getting your bike to
the riding
area then your 4-stokes does in 3 rides.
Mike
Hobbs
02/13/03
Hello, My
name is Dale Lineaweaver. I have been contracted to modify an 03
CRF 450R to be campaigned in the FUSA Pro-Singles national
Dirttrack Series. I read with great interest your intention of
using an Amp-Link system on your project 450. Did you indeed
complete said project and if so what information may you share
with me regarding the Amp-Link?
Thank you
in advance for your anticipated reply.
Kind
regards,
Dale Lineaweaver
Lineaweaver Research and Development
Phone / Fax: 510 223-9052
Kevin
Gorny looked into this.
-Editor
Yeah
I did, it just never got off the ground. The creator (a friend
of mine) isn't really too interested in making those for public
use. He had the intention, but is getting too busy with the auto
industry that his company is more involved in (Amp-Research).
Kevin
Gorzny
02/21/03
I'm
considering either the CRF 230 or the XR 250First Pros/cons? I
haven't ridden for many years and am looking for mild
recreation in the CA desert. Thoughts?
David King
Del Mar, CA
David,
Don't get me wrong, I think the CRF230F is a great bike, but it
is intended for a completely different type of riding than the
XR250R. The fact that Honda has bestowed it's CRF designation on
this bike is a bit of a red herring. It is more similar to the
XR200R than the XR250R, and certainly not comparable to the
CRF450R in any way.
The XR250R is aimed at a more serious crowd, with fully
adjustable front and rear compression and rebound, longer
suspension travel (10.6" front and rear compared to 9''
rear, 9.5" front,) sturdier frame and suspension (41mm
compared to 37mm front forks), front and rear disk brakes, four
valve heads, and a lighting coil with head and tail lights. Both
bikes have six speed transmissions, but the engine design is
like night and day - the XR250R motor is built tougher and
boasts higher compression than the 230.
While I have known people to race the XR200Rs in the local
enduros, they are intended as a playbikes - which may be more
along the lines you are looking for. The CRF230F is a step up
from the 200 with the addition of electric start (the only
off-road Honda currently in production to have it, aside from
the XR650L DualSport,) front disk brakes (over drums on both for
the XR200R), larger rear wheel - 18" compared to 17"
(XR250R also has 18'.)
I guess the question is how hard are you going to ride it? Both
are extremely reliable - no problem there - but the XR250R has
less limitations.
-
Editor
02/17/03
William, I
was wanting to know if I could ask you for some direction or
help on a trip that my son John and I would like to come to
Colorado to do. We have been traveling all over the West and
Northwest and everywhere we go, we always say the same thing, I
wish I had our dirtbikes. Well this year we want to do it. We
would like to find somewhere that we can camp with our motorhome
and ride up into the high country and explore mining towns. I am
having such a hard time looking this winter for info. Can you
help us?
If not
Ouray, where would you suggest?
Thanks for
any info you could provide us.
John,
There are a tremendous amount of opportunities out here, and
just about everyone has something different to suggest. Ouray
has some amazing trails - geared mostly for the 4x4s - but you
do see bikers on them! I highly recommend getting the The
Motorcycle Trails of Colorado" from L&M Productions for
planning your vacation:
Colorado
Off Highway Vehicle Coalition
http://www.cohvco.org/
http://cohvco.org/trailguide/index.htm
Trails
Also:
Rules etc... State park rules etc apply to federal lands - You
need an
OHV permit or street legal plate - also a spark arrestor
http://www.parks.state.co.us/OHV/
The
Motorcycle Trails of Colorado
http://www.lmproductions.com/L&M2.htm
Guides
http://www.lmproductions.com/L&M5.htm
Maps
Trails
Illustrated: Excellent Topo Maps - have trails by use
http://www.trailsillustrated.com/acb/Category.cfm?&DID=15&CATID=10
-
Editor
02/16/03
Once again
a great article from Rick! This article represents a clear case
for "experience does matter".
02/18/03
I own a
2002 YZ426 and love it. I had a 1999 WR400 fully uncorked and
loved it but my '02 YZ426 is much better everywhere. My brother
in law has a 2001 and 2002 YZ250F and I have ridden both and
think they are great. I have friends with 2002 and 2003 WR250F's
and I just bought a 2003 YZ250F so I have some experience with
YZ's and WR's. I have extensively ridden all these bikes in the
California Desert on sand washes, rocky technical goat trails,
big hill climbs and dirt roads.
For climbing steep long hill climbs with loose sand, the YZ426
or CRF450 are best and easiest to climb with.
For going as fast as you can on a single track trails of dirt,
sand or rocks in the California Desert the YZ250F is the best
and easiest bike I have ever ridden either going up hill or
down. It is so flickable and easy to control that everything,
other then climbing huge sand hill climbs, is easy, fun and
fast. You feel like a much better rider on the 250F. Since I
spend so little time climbing big hills, I am thinking of
selling my 426 and getting another 250F because it is soooooooo
much fun to ride.
After spending several days on my new YZ250F, I had a chance to
ride a fully uncorked 2002 WR250 and a 2003 WR250 with some mods
done. I found the YZ250F to be a much much better bike with
regards to handling, power, control, balance, basically
everything. After riding the YZ250F, the WR250's felt sluggish,
low on power, I couldn't find the right gear and the steering
felt slow. Basically the suspension was better than an 2002
XR250, which is a bike I just sold to buy the YZ250F, but
everything else was a disappointment compared to the YZ250F. I
had tried to talk my daughter into letting me buy her a 2003
WR250F but she absolutely did not want an electric start bike.
She is only 5'4" and is 13 years old. She loves her new YZ
and can start it without a problem. She can also start my 426
easily. What a girl!
After riding an '03 WR250F and being able to compare it side by
side with my 2003 YZ250F, I am so so glad my daughter wanted the
YZ. My son and I both ride a 2002 YZ426 and we both prefer the
YZ250F.
By the way, I also have an XR650L which is great for going fast
on dirt roads but that is about all it does well.
For 95% of where I ride off-road, the YZ250F is the best bike I
have ever ridden in the past 10 years. It won't go 110 MPH down
a dirt road, but then again, I never do that.
You say the WR250 is fast but I say it is slow and disappointing
compared to the YZ250F. Maybe that is not a fair comparison but
I had exclusively ridden enduro bikes for 9 years before getting
my '02 YZ426. I am 51 years old and have been riding motorcycles
since I was 15. After getting used to the YZ, it made me wish I
had spent the last 10 years riding YZ's or CR's instead of XR's.
I have some other friends who ride KTM 525's and they have also
found a close ratio transmission is much more fun than wide
ratio for 95% of where we ride. KTM's MXC is a great combination
bike between an enduro and a motocross bike. I used to be one of
the slower riders on my WR or XR. But now with my YZ250F, no one
in the group I ride with can out run me.
The YZ's and WR's are from two completely different worlds and I
am not sure many people know this. If your speed is slow to
medium buy a WR or XR. But if you want to get faster and enjoy
the thrill of speed and control, get a YZ.
Jim Dueck
|